The executive director of the film academy said that Farraf Fawcett wasn’t included in the academy awards in Memoriam segment because the actress was better known as a television star.
It was a difficult decision for the committee that assembles the segment to omit Farrah Fawcett according to the motion picture arts. Which also added he is not surprised by the reaction of some of her fans and family members.
After a lot of discussion by the committee Fawcett was in fact omitted basically for her many roles on television. In every category you are gong to miss some important people but the challenge is getting the right people to the right nominations.
When asked why Michael Jackson was included and others were not, they explained his last movie that was totally theatrical was phenomenal and he deserved to be recognized for it. According to sources there was nothing the committee could do.
And yet, something doesn’t set right. If they are the nominations committee there was a lot they could have done and they didn’t. This doesn’t make sense, Farah Fawcett was just as big as Michael Jackson in the concept that they were both acting and both loved every minute of it. So, how is this so different?
Michael Jackson had a lot of fans, however so did Farrah Fawcett and still they put Michhael Jackson above her, how did they come to this conclusion? Who made the final input as to whether Michael Jackson was inducted or Farrah Fawcett who had been battling cancer for a long time. They are two different stories however the same in context that they both deserved it. Why didn’t they have a tie between the two of them, or do Farrah this year and Michael next year. That at least would’ve gone over better with the fans.
One Comment
limited time only! hurry!